Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-8-30
pubmed:abstractText
Sixty-two patients presented with an infected total hip arthroplasty. Their management depended on their general medical condition, the clinical signs of infection, the type of infection, the degree of fixation of the components and the available bone stock. Treatment consisted of one of the following: debridement and lavage without removing the prosthesis, one or two stage revision arthroplasty, or excision arthroplasty. There were 11 early and 51 late infections. The commonest bacterium isolated was Staphylococcus epidermidis (30%). Primary revision of the femoral component was slightly more successful with a cemented prosthesis than with an uncemented prosthesis. The overall success rates for cemented and uncemented femoral components were roughly comparable (91.5%:90%). We make various recommendations for the management of infected total hip arthroplasties based on our experience.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0341-2695
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
14
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
161-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
Treatment of infected joint arthroplasty.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, University of Basel, Switzerland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review