Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6A
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-7-24
pubmed:abstractText
The efficacy of nonprescription doses of loperamide hydrochloride (Imodium A-D) was compared with nonfibrous activated attapulgite (Diasorb) in a randomized, parallel, open-label study of adult patients with acute diarrhea. The results of the study showed loperamide to be more effective than attapulgite in the control of diarrhea. Loperamide significantly reduced stool frequency compared with attapulgite, particularly within the first 12-hour period following the start of therapy, and significantly shortened the mean time to last unformed stool (loperamide, 14.2 hours, versus attapulgite, 19.5 hours). Subjective evaluations of severity of enteric symptoms, overall relief following treatment, and overall relief after 48 hours of treatment were equivalent for both drugs. Both treatments were well tolerated, and there was no difference between treatments with respect to the proportion of patients reporting adverse experiences.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0002-9343
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
20
pubmed:volume
88
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
20S-23S
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
A randomized, open-label comparison of nonprescription loperamide and attapulgite in the symptomatic treatment of acute diarrhea.
pubmed:affiliation
Program in Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77030.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't