Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1990-6-28
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) by the enteral route was compared with intravenous ORT in a group of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Rehydration was successfully accomplished in both groups; however, enteral rehydration was more comfortable, more economical, and caused fewer complications than the intravenous infusion. When the study was expanded to patients undergoing colonic surgery, the results were encouraging; enteral ORT in patients undergoing gastric or duodenal surgery was less successful.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0149-2918
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
12 Suppl A
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
122-8
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-16
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1990
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Postoperative rehydration.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Dr. Gray's Hospital, Elgin, Morayshire, Scotland.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|