Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-5-18
pubmed:abstractText
Through several recent and widely publicized cases, misconduct in science has caught the public's attention and reached the agenda of Congress. After a brief historical overview, this article presents a number of cases from family medicine raising issues of duplicate publication, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, citation errors, inappropriate attribution, and data manipulation and fabrication. Misconduct policies from national organizations are noted, and specific recommendations are made that would limit growth of misconduct in the family medicine research community.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0742-3225
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
137-42
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Historical Article