Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21621746
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-6-27
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Cognitive therapy (CT) assumes that personality disorders (PDs) are characterized by interpretational biases that maintain the disorder. Changing interpretations is therefore a major aim of CT of PDs. This study tested whether Borderline PD (BPD), Avoidant and Dependent PD (AV/DEPD), and Obsessive-Compulsive PD (OCPD) are characterized by specific interpretations. Among the 122 participants there were 55 PD patients (17 BPD, 30 AV/DEPD, 29 OCPD diagnoses), 26 axis-1 patients, and 41 nonpatients. Participants put themselves into 10 scripts of negative events and noted feelings, thoughts and behaviors that came to mind. Next, they chose between hypothesized BPD-specific, AV/DEPD-specific, and OCPD-specific interpretations of each event (forced choice). Lastly, participants rated belief in each interpretation. Regression analyses revealed that forced choices and belief ratings supported the CT-model of BPD and AV/DEP: interpretations were specific. The alleged OCPD-beliefs were however not specifically related to OCPD, with relatively high popularity in axis-1 patients and nonpatients. The open responses were classified by judges blind for diagnoses, with the following results. BPD was characterized by low levels of solution-focused and healthy-flexible/accepting responses, and higher levels of criticizing others and malevolent interpretations of others. AV/DEPD was characterized by lower levels of solution-focused responses, and higher levels of self-criticism, negative emotions, guilt and fear of judgment, as well as lower levels of other-criticism. OCPD only showed trends for lower healthy responses, and higher compulsiveness and worry. It is concluded that the assumptions of CT are supported for BPD and AV/DEPD, but not - at least not on the explicit interpretational level - for OCPD. CT of OCPD might need a slightly different approach.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
1873-622X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
472-81
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Compulsive Behavior,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Culture,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Personality,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Personality Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:21621746-Severity of Illness Index
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Interpretation bias in Cluster-C and borderline personality disorders.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Arnoud.Arntz@MaastrichtUniversity.nl
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|