Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1990-6-1
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Relative renal function is estimated by comparing the area under the second segment of the curve from the renal region of interest in a renographic study. We have examined the problems arising out of area normalization of the renal region of interest in the data analysis for relative renal function evaluation. Error analysis by computer simulation proves that this method of data analysis is highly misleading and erroneous.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0883-2889
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
41
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
243-5
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-6-4
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1990
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Area normalization of the renal region of interest in radionuclide renography data analysis: a misconception.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|