Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-6-13
pubmed:abstractText
We analyzed studies validating the effectiveness and deficiencies of simulation for training and assessment in urology. We documented simulation types (synthetic, virtual reality and animal models), participant experience level and tasks performed. The feasibility, validity, cost-effectiveness, reliability and educational impact of the simulators were also evaluated.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
1527-3792
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
186
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
26-34
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review.
pubmed:affiliation
Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, King's Health Partners, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. k.ahmed@imperial.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't