|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-5-13
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
CONTEXT.?The communication demands faced by specialists in poison information (SPI) are unique in the health-care context. OBJECTIVES.?(1) To describe SPI communication patterns for the highest risk poison exposure calls using cluster analysis, and (2) to describe variation in communication patterns or clusters. METHODS.?A sample of 1 year of poison exposure calls to a regional poison control center with SPIs' perceived severity rating of major or moderate perceived was collected. Digital voice recordings were linked with medical records and were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Descriptive analyses were applied, and cluster-analytic techniques were used to assess variation in call communication and factors associated with that variation. RESULTS.?Cases were described, and four communication styles were identified. The informational cluster represents calls with relatively high levels of SPI clinical information and caller questions. The Facilitative cluster represents calls with a pattern of relatively high SPI questions and caller information provision. The Planning cluster represents calls with relatively high levels of SPI relationship talk. The Emotional cluster represents calls with relatively high caller and SPI emotion. Further analyses revealed relationships between call characteristics, SPI identity, and cluster membership. CONCLUSION.?This study provides a beginning step to understanding SPI communication behaviors. Our results suggest that SPIs are able to use a range of communication strategies that often involve not only information but also emotional responsiveness and rapport building. Findings also point to the opportunity for future communication training for SPIs to meet the needs of the heterogeneous caller population.
|
|
pubmed:grant |
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-11589219,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-12477606,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-12767591,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-15165967,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-16005784,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-16166865,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-16195944,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-16200514,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-16406464,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-17138507,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-18259957,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-18698394,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-18823177,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-18845413,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-19446121,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-19586357,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-19656011,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-2048980,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-2646486,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-7564938,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-8258897,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-8771634,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21563908-9002500
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1556-9519
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
316-23
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-9-13
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Child, Preschool,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Communication,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Infant,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Infant, Newborn,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Information Services,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Poison Control Centers,
pubmed-meshheading:21563908-Retrospective Studies
|
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Communication patterns for the most serious poison center calls.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5880, USA. lee.ellington@nurs.utah.edu
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
