rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0009491,
umls-concept:C0023981,
umls-concept:C0026845,
umls-concept:C0038016,
umls-concept:C0087111,
umls-concept:C0185023,
umls-concept:C0301559,
umls-concept:C0522523,
umls-concept:C0728733,
umls-concept:C1522662,
umls-concept:C1579762
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-5-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Both the paraspinal muscle sparing approach and percutaneous screw fixation are less traumatic procedures in comparison with the conventional midline approach. These techniques have been used with the goal of reducing muscle injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the safety and efficacy of the paraspinal muscle sparing technique and percutaneous screw fixation for the treatment of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1598-7876
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
49
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
163-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-7-28
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Paraspinal Muscle Sparing versus Percutaneous Screw Fixation : A Prospective and Comparative Study for the Treatment of L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|