Linked Life Data

21447223

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21447223

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-3-30
pubmed:abstractText
The use of diagnostic imaging is increasing rapidly. Imaging tests can lead to fast and accurate diagnosis but as they can be harmful these tests need to be carefully evaluated. This evaluation generally involves three steps: evaluation of analytic validity or reliability (e.g. reproducibility), evaluation of clinical validity (e.g. positive and negative predictive value) and evaluation of clinical benefit (e.g. improvement in life-expectancy and quality of life). Two commonly observed problems with current research are the overall poor quality of many diagnostic studies and the relative absence of studies evaluating the added value and clinical benefit of imaging tests. Research into the clinical utility of imaging is not simple; it requires multi-disciplinary co-operation and the methodology is less well developed than in research into the effects of therapy. Pressure is increasing, both from society and from government, to improve the evaluation of imaging tests.
pubmed:language
dut
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1876-8784
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
155
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
A2996
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
[Too little evaluation of diagnostic imaging tests].
pubmed:affiliation
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Afd. Radiologie, Utrecht, The Netherlands. pimdejong@gmail.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract, Review