Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21384190
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-4-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
INTRODUCTION: Neurosurgical intensive care units were increasingly agglomerated in large centralized interdisciplinary intensive care units in the last two decades. In the majority, these centralized interdisciplinary intensive care units were directed and managed by intensivists coming from anaesthesiology. We sought to review the evidence supporting neurosurgical intensive care as a highly specialized discipline resulting in benefits for the treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In general, neurosurgical and neurocritical intensive care has been associated with improved outcomes and reduced mortality rates, reduced length of intensive care stay, improved resource utilisation, decreased in-hospital mortality, and fiscal benefits.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
1435-2451
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
396
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
447-51
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Neurosurgical intensive care unit--essential for good outcomes in neurosurgery?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. lang.josef@mh-hannover.de
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|