| pubmed-article:21360405 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0015259 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0035953 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1510802 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0549178 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1272706 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:issue | 6 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2011-3-18 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:abstractText | The aim of this study was to objectively quantify ratings of perceived enjoyment using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale following high-intensity interval running versus moderate-intensity continuous running. Eight recreationally active men performed two running protocols consisting of high-intensity interval running (6 × 3 min at 90% VO(2max) interspersed with 6 × 3 min active recovery at 50% VO(2max) with a 7-min warm-up and cool down at 70% VO(2max)) or 50 min moderate-intensity continuous running at 70% VO(2max). Ratings of perceived enjoyment after exercise were higher (P < 0.05) following interval running compared with continuous running (88 ± 6 vs. 61 ± 12) despite higher (P < 0.05) ratings of perceived exertion (14 ± 1 vs. 13 ± 1). There was no difference (P < 0.05) in average heart rate (88 ± 3 vs. 87 ± 3% maximum heart rate), average VO(2) (71 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 4%VO(2max)), total VO(2) (162 ± 16 vs. 166 ± 27 L) or energy expenditure (811 ± 83 vs. 832 ± 136 kcal) between protocols. The greater enjoyment associated with high-intensity interval running may be relevant for improving exercise adherence, since running is a low-cost exercise intervention requiring no exercise equipment and similar relative exercise intensities have previously induced health benefits in patient populations. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:month | Mar | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:issn | 1466-447X | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DrustBarryB | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CloseGraeme... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MacLarenDon... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GregsonWarren... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MortonJames... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BartlettJonat... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:volume | 29 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:pagination | 547-53 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21360405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:year | 2011 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:articleTitle | High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:affiliation | Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21360405 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
