Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21360405
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-3-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The aim of this study was to objectively quantify ratings of perceived enjoyment using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale following high-intensity interval running versus moderate-intensity continuous running. Eight recreationally active men performed two running protocols consisting of high-intensity interval running (6 × 3 min at 90% VO(2max) interspersed with 6 × 3 min active recovery at 50% VO(2max) with a 7-min warm-up and cool down at 70% VO(2max)) or 50 min moderate-intensity continuous running at 70% VO(2max). Ratings of perceived enjoyment after exercise were higher (P < 0.05) following interval running compared with continuous running (88 ± 6 vs. 61 ± 12) despite higher (P < 0.05) ratings of perceived exertion (14 ± 1 vs. 13 ± 1). There was no difference (P < 0.05) in average heart rate (88 ± 3 vs. 87 ± 3% maximum heart rate), average VO(2) (71 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 4%VO(2max)), total VO(2) (162 ± 16 vs. 166 ± 27 L) or energy expenditure (811 ± 83 vs. 832 ± 136 kcal) between protocols. The greater enjoyment associated with high-intensity interval running may be relevant for improving exercise adherence, since running is a low-cost exercise intervention requiring no exercise equipment and similar relative exercise intensities have previously induced health benefits in patient populations.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1466-447X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
29
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
547-53
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Energy Metabolism,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Exercise,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Heart Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Oxygen Consumption,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Physical Exertion,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Pleasure,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Running,
pubmed-meshheading:21360405-Young Adult
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|