rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-2-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To define the role of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral stones, we compared the outcomes of primary LU with those of ureterorenoscopy (URS), the currently established modality in this circumstance.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1557-9034
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
21
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
7-13
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Blood Loss, Surgical,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Laparoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Length of Stay,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Lithotripsy,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Postoperative Complications,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Treatment Outcome,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Ureter,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Ureteral Calculi,
pubmed-meshheading:21190478-Ureteroscopy
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral calculi: comparison to rigid ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|