Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21149653
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-1-7
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The level of scientific evidence on which the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines are based has not been systematically investigated. We describe the distribution of categories of evidence and consensus (EC) among the 10 most common cancers with regard to recommendations for staging, initial and salvage therapy, and surveillance.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
1527-7755
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
10
|
pubmed:volume |
29
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
186-91
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Clinical Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Consensus,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Evidence-Based Practice,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Peer Review, Research,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Practice Guidelines as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:21149653-Quality Control
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|