Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2104708rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521457lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2104708lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2104708lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0851346lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2104708lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2104708lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:dateCreated1990-2-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:abstractTextIt is often necessary to estimate the dose of radiation to a fetus from a series of CT scans. To assist in making this process easier and more accurate, we measured fetal doses in an adult anthropomorphic phantom for four CT scanners: Picker 1200, Siemens DRH, GE 9800, and GE 8800. Measurements were made at four kilovoltages (100, 120, 130, and 140 kVp), for 2-, 5-, 8-, and 10-mm thicknesses, for two scanning angles (360 degrees and 398 degrees) and for two patient orientations (prone and supine). The fetal-dose estimates are based on the CT dose index measured by using a pencil ionization chamber at the center position of a 16-cm-diameter cylindrical phantom. Comparison with data from other investigators shows reasonable agreement when phantom differences, X-ray tube output, and equipment calibration are considered.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:issn0361-803Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PriceJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrayJ EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FelmleeJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeetzowM LMLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:volume154lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:pagination185-90lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:dateRevised2008-2-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2104708-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:articleTitleEstimated fetal radiation dose from multislice CT studies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2104708pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2104708lld:pubmed