Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20936317
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-1-18
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The relative sensitivity of commercial agglutination kits for fast identification of S. aureus is usually given to be about 98%. This reported sensitivity has sometimes been questioned. In this study, three collections of molecularly defined, single-copy strains of S. aureus were used to compare the sensitivities of agglutination-based identification and the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry-based identification using the Biotyper 2.0 database to a molecularly defined reference method. Clinical isolates (n?=?363) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 240 clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were included. In order to rule out a predominance of local MRSA-strains, a collection of 104 pulsed-field-gel electrophoresis divergent MRSA strains were also tested. MALDI-TOF MS using Biotyper database (Bruker) identified all isolates, whereas the Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux) detected only 98.0% of the MSSA, 94.5% of the MRSA and only 70.1% of the MRSA of the molecularly divergent strain collection. Interestingly, strains with a false-negative test result in the agglutination methods were mostly spa-type t001 and t001 related. The MALDI-TOF MS based identification can thus be used as an alternative identification method for suspected false-negative results from the agglutination tests, especially if the local prevalence of t001 and t001 related strains is high.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1435-4373
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
30
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
201-8
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Agglutination Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Bacterial Typing Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Bacteriological Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Diagnostic Errors,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-False Negative Reactions,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Molecular Typing,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser...,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Staphylococcal Infections,
pubmed-meshheading:20936317-Staphylococcus aureus
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
False-negative test results in the Slidex Staph Plus (bioMérieux) agglutination test are mainly caused by spa-type t001 and t001-related strains.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Department for Medical Microbiology, University of Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum, Germany. Florian.szabados@rub.de
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Evaluation Studies
|