20931878

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20931878

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0019842, umls-concept:C0025663, umls-concept:C1511790, umls-concept:C1707455
pubmed:issue	8
pubmed:dateCreated	2010-10-11
pubmed:abstractText	We investigated the advantages and disadvantages of six methods to detect classical swine fever virus (CSFV).
pubmed:language	chi
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/21610860R
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Aug
pubmed:issn	0001-6209
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:ChangTianmingT, pubmed-author:LiH KHK, pubmed-author:LiHongyuH, pubmed-author:N, pubmed-author:QiuHuajiH, pubmed-author:SunYuanY, pubmed-author:WangXiangpengX, pubmed-author:YangZengqiZ, pubmed-author:ZhangXingjuanX
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:day	4
pubmed:volume	50
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	1087-93
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:20931878-Chromatography, pubmed-meshheading:20931878-Classical swine fever virus, pubmed-meshheading:20931878-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, pubmed-meshheading:20931878-Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, pubmed-meshheading:20931878-Sensitivity and Specificity
pubmed:year	2010
pubmed:articleTitle	[Comparison of six detection methods for classical swine fever virus].
pubmed:affiliation	College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. wangxiangpeng2003@126.com
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't