Linked Life Data

20922764

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20922764

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-11-25
pubmed:abstractText
Despite some reported limitations, Web of Science has been the standard source to assess the impact of individual articles, and consequently journals. By analysing the citations to articles published in the field of paediatric oncology, we demonstrate that Scopus and Google Scholar, the two new citation databases, retrieve more citations than Web of Science. The strength of Scopus lies in identifying non-English literature from Western and Eastern Europe, while Google Scholar is proficient at identifying English and non-English literature from Africa, Asia and Central and South America. These findings have implications for researchers, journals and health libraries.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
1545-5017
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
56
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
152-3
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Assessing the impact of paediatric oncology publications using three citation databases.
pubmed:affiliation
Cancer Research UK Paediatric and Familial Cancer Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. reemaraman@doctors.org.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't