Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20890192
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
12
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-11-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Certain methodologic features of animal experiments such as random assignment have been found to reduce the risk of bias. Because animal research sometimes informs clinical practice, explicit acknowledgment of the risk of bias and clinical relevance cultivates realistic expectations on the part of clinicians reading preclinical studies. We assessed literature reviews of therapeutic interventions for sepsis that include animal experiments for explicit appraisals of the risk of bias and clinical relevance.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
1530-0293
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
38
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
2401-8
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Combined Modality Therapy,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Critical Care,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Critical Illness,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Disease Models, Animal,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Intervention Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Risk Assessment,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Sepsis,
pubmed-meshheading:20890192-Survival Analysis
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Systematic review of reviews including animal studies addressing therapeutic interventions for sepsis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Clinical Research Centre Étienne Le Bel and Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. francois.lamontagne@usherbrooke.ca
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Meta-Analysis
|