Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-11-22
pubmed:abstractText
Certain methodologic features of animal experiments such as random assignment have been found to reduce the risk of bias. Because animal research sometimes informs clinical practice, explicit acknowledgment of the risk of bias and clinical relevance cultivates realistic expectations on the part of clinicians reading preclinical studies. We assessed literature reviews of therapeutic interventions for sepsis that include animal experiments for explicit appraisals of the risk of bias and clinical relevance.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1530-0293
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2401-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Systematic review of reviews including animal studies addressing therapeutic interventions for sepsis.
pubmed:affiliation
Clinical Research Centre Étienne Le Bel and Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. francois.lamontagne@usherbrooke.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Meta-Analysis