|
pubmed:abstractText |
The compatibility of recovery work with the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model has been debated; and little is known about how to best measure the work of recovery. Two ACT teams with high and low recovery orientation were identified by expert consensus and compared on a number of dimensions. Using an interpretive, qualitative approach to analyze interview and observation data, teams differed in the extent to which the environment, team structure, staff attitudes, and processes of working with consumers supported principles of recovery orientation. We present a model of recovery work and discuss implications for research and practice.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
VA HSR&D Center on Implementing Evidence-Based Practice, Roudebush VAMC and Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. mpsalyer@iupui.edu
|
