Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-4-22
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A simple method for predicting new crises after parasuicide is introduced. This method makes it possible, without any previous knowledge, to filter out 50% of the risk patients, who may then receive special preventive activities. An examination of the practice of evaluating the danger of suicide shows that such judgments are based on four criteria: (1) risk groups, (2) crises and crisis progression, (3) suicidal development, and (4) the presuicidal syndrome.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Nov
|
| pubmed:issn |
0227-5910
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
11
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
34-6
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1990
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Contribution to suicide risk assessment: II. On the practice of suicide risk assessment.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
University of Vienna, Austria.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|