Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9740
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-8-16
pubmed:databankReference
pubmed:abstractText
The ideal substitute for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve disease is not known. Our hypothesis was that the regulatory and adaptive properties of a living valve substitute could improve the long-term outcomes in patients. We therefore compared these outcomes after autograft aortic root replacement (Ross procedure) versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
1474-547X
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
14
pubmed:volume
376
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
524-31
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't