Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-7-26
pubmed:abstractText
Although 'insignificant' prostate cancer has been examined separately in radical prostatectomy (RP) and radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP) studies, it is not entirely clear whether cancers designated as 'insignificant' on RP and RCP represent the same, similar or different forms of prostate cancer. Insignificant prostate cancer has been traditionally defined based on the pathological findings in the whole prostate gland. In addition to the pathological determinants of 'insignificant' prostate cancer, it is also important to account for the biological and the clinical context of the disease, as well as patient age and health status to designate a prostate cancer 'insignificant'. This review examines and compares prostate cancers described as 'insignificant' on RP and RCP. We conclude that in most cases these low-volume/low-grade prostate cancers represent an early stage and clinically 'silent' disease, which are only detected in different clinical settings.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
1464-410X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
106
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
304-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
'Insignificant' prostate cancer on prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy: variation on a theme 'low-volume/low-grade' prostate cancer?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. kiril.trpkov@cls.ab.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review