|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-7-29
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Due to language limitations, the abstract of journal article may be the only way for people of non-Chinese speaking countries to know about trials in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). However, little is known about the reporting quality of these trial abstracts. Our study is to assess the reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in four leading Chinese medical journals of TCM, and to identify any differences in reporting between the Chinese and English version of the same abstract publication.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1745-6215
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
75
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-30
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Chinese Cochrane Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
