|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-6-21
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We investigated the onset time of obturator nerve block and time required for the nerve block comparing two groups in a prospective randomized study.
|
|
pubmed:language |
jpn
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0021-4892
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
59
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
686-90
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Anesthesia, General,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Nerve Block,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Obturator Nerve,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:20560365-Ultrasonography
|
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Technical advantages of ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block compared with the nerve stimulating technique].
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8543.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|
