Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20535811
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-8-31
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We examined the influence of flexed knee positions on cartilage MR assessments. Sagittal T(2), T*(2), and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) maps of the femoral cartilage were obtained in eight 6-month-old porcine femorotibial joints in the extended knee position (position A: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft in parallel with the amplitude of static field), flexed knee position (position B: flexion 40 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field), and oblique-placed knee-extended position (position C: flexion 0 degrees and femoral shaft oriented at 40 degrees to the amplitude of static field). Comparison of the MR parameters between positions A and C showed isolated influence of the magic-angle effect, and comparison between positions A and B showed effects of knee flexion. Proteoglycan and hydroxyproline content in cartilage specimen at each region of interest had no significant correlation with T(2), T*(2), and dGEMRIC values. At the central zone, located on a weight-bearing area and parallel to the amplitude of static field, T(2)/T*(2)/dGEMRIC values increased by 6.8/11/0.8% at position C and by 24/44/31% at position B compared with position A. There was a significant increase in T(2) and T*(2) values at position B compared with those at position A. The substantial changes in T(2), T*(2), and dGEMRIC were shown in response to knee flexion, presumably due to the compounding influence of the magic-angle effect and change in the intra-articular biomechanical condition.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1522-2594
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
64
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
707-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Cartilage, Articular,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Joints,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Posture,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Range of Motion, Articular,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:20535811-Swine
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Influence of knee positions on T2, T*2, and dGEMRIC mapping in porcine knee cartilage.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|