Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-12-24
pubmed:abstractText
We aimed at comparing the long term clinical outcome of SES and PES in routine clinical practice.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
1522-726X
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
77
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
5-12
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Cardiovascular Agents, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Chi-Square Distribution, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Coronary Angiography, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Coronary Stenosis, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Diabetes Mellitus, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Drug-Eluting Stents, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Female, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Male, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Myocardial Infarction, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Paclitaxel, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Proportional Hazards Models, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Prosthesis Design, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Registries, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Risk Factors, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Severity of Illness Index, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Sirolimus, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Switzerland, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Thrombosis, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:20506333-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Sirolimus versus paclitaxel coronary stents in clinical practice.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study