Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-4-8
pubmed:abstractText
In this paper we evaluate the performance and usefulness of three semantic background knowledge sources for predicting synonymous anatomical terms across species boundaries. The reference sources under evaluation are UMLS, FMA-OBO and WordNet, which are applied to the anatomical ontologies of mouse and zebrafish. Our results show that the use of specialized knowledge sources leads to highly accurate predictions, verified through complete manual curation, which can be further improved by combining multiple of said sources. We argue that these three references complement each other in terms of granularity and specificity. From our results we conclude that these references can be used to create reliable ontology mappings with minimal human supervision.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1613-4516
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
7
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
An evaluation of the performance of three semantic background knowledge sources in comparative anatomy.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. ln.ruw@nullneziuhpOnav.tsenrE
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article