20339450

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20339450

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0024947, umls-concept:C0440138, umls-concept:C0449851, umls-concept:C1185729, umls-concept:C1704302, umls-concept:C1706094, umls-concept:C1866081
pubmed:dateCreated	2010-3-26
pubmed:abstractText	Objective. This in vitro study uses measurements of fracture resistance to compare maxillary premolars restored with the bonded amalgam technique using a new resin luting cement, glass ionomer, and resin-modified glass ionomer as the bonding agents. Materials. Eighty-five sound maxillary premolars were selected and randomly assigned to one of five test groups of 17 teeth each. One group of intact teeth served as the control. The remaining groups were prepared to a standard cavity form relative to the dimensions of the overall tooth and restored with amalgam alone or a bonded amalgam using one of three luting agents: RelyX Arc (a new resin luting cement), RelyX luting (a resin-modified glass ionomer), or Ketac-Cem mu (a glass ionomer) as the bonding agents. Each tooth was then subjected to compressive testing until catastrophic failure occurred. The mean loads at failure of each group were statistically compared using ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni test. Results. It was found that regardless of the luting cement used for the amalgam bonding technique, there was little effect on the fracture resistance of teeth. Conclusion. Cusp fracture resistance of premolars prepared with conservative MOD cavity preparations is not improved by using an amalgam-bonding technique compared to similar cavities restored with amalgam alone.
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-11203849, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-11508095, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-11551017, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-12878022, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-1501170, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-15623998, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-2374743, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-2667020, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-8054193, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-9002870, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-9590907, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20339450-9656921
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/101524183
pubmed:status	PubMed-not-MEDLINE
pubmed:issn	1687-8736
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:ColderoLarryL, pubmed-author:MarchanShivaughn MSM, pubmed-author:RafeekReisha NRN, pubmed-author:SmithWilliam A JWA, pubmed-author:WhiteDanielD
pubmed:issnType	Electronic
pubmed:volume	2009
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	946830
pubmed:year	2009
pubmed:articleTitle	Cusp fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with the bonded amalgam technique using various luting agents.
pubmed:affiliation	School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article