rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-6-7
|
pubmed:abstractText |
There is a wide range of surgical procedures available to treat rectal prolapse that differ in approach as well as in principle. The current perineal approaches available involve mucosal or full thickness resection. There are currently no accepted procedures combining rectal fixation without resection using the perineal approach. We present our initial report of transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1128-045X
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
14
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
169-73
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Cohort Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Perineum,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Rectal Prolapse,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Surgical Mesh,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Treatment Outcome,
pubmed-meshheading:20309717-Vagina
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Transvaginal sacrospinous rectopexy: initial clinical experience.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. gurlanb@ccf.org
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|