Linked Life Data

20301844

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20301844

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-3-22
pubmed:abstractText
The salience of a transformation between a pair of contours depends on the type of transformation (eg a reflection or a translation) and also on figure-ground organisation. Reflection is most salient when both contours belong to the same surface, and translation is most salient when they do not connect a surface. These findings are based on reaction time (RT). Here I replicate and extend them by measuring both RT and sensitivity. The figure-ground relations were changed unambiguously by using stereograms. I compared reflection and translation when they were present within a surface or across surfaces (experiment 1), and within an object or a hole (experiments 2-4). Holes are interesting because they are not objects, but their presence does not increase the number of total objects in the scene. The within-surface advantage for reflection was present in all experiments. There was a between-surface advantage for translation in experiment 1 but there was no hole advantage for translation in experiments 2-4. Thus the effect of context, ie objectness, on detection of regularity is a robust and general phenomenon present in every experiment, but the type of interaction differs for reflection and translation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0301-0066
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
39
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
27-40
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Sensitivity to reflection and translation is modulated by objectness.
pubmed:affiliation
School of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. M.Bertamini@liverpool.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article