Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2028617rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005961lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204727lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205390lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:dateCreated1991-6-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:abstractTextFrom May 1978 to September 1989 45 patients underwent 25 allogeneic and 21 autologous bone marrow transplantations (BMT) and 1 peripheral stem cell transplantation for the following indications: severe aplastic anemia (n = 4), hematological malignancies (n = 28), malignant solid tumours (n = 12) and sideroblastic anemia (n = 1). The first group of 20 patients was isolated in a conventional hospital room, while management of the aplastic phase in the second group of 25 patients was performed in a laminar air flow (LAF) unit. All patients received total decontamination. In a retrospective analysis the number of positive blood cultures during the neutropenic period was 85% in the first group, as compared with 40% in the second group, and the number of febrile episodes was 85% versus 64%, respectively. Despite the fact that the septic morbidity was lower in the LAF group, mortality during the neutropenic period (15% in group I versus 16% in group II) was unaffected and survival rate (45% in group I versus 36% in group II) did not improve. We conclude that LAF protection will only have a positive impact on survival rate if the incidence of non-infectious complications of BMT, such as organ toxicity or graft-versus-host disease, is likewise reduced.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:issn0043-5325lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LacknerHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UrbanCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SlavcIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HauerCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GamillschegAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:volume103lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:pagination82-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2028617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:articleTitle[Infections in the neutropenic phase following bone marrow transplantation: comparison of laminar airflow isolation with conventional isolation].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:affiliationUniversitäts-Kinderklinik, Graz.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2028617pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed