Linked Life Data

2023651

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/2023651

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-6-6
pubmed:abstractText
The influence on practice of a publication about a randomised clinical trial of chemonucleolysis (CNL) vs. herniotomy in patients with lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc was investigated, using a questionnaire sent to neurosurgeons and neurologists. There were no differences between responses of neurosurgeons and neurologists, nor between academic and non-academic specialists. 63 (57%) of the respondents stated they were not influenced by the paper, 48 (43%) stated they were. 40 of those said they thought more favourably about herniotomy, 8 more favourably about CNL. Opinion about CNL and advice to patients about CNL had no effect on being influenced or not by the article. However, they did modify the direction of influence: both negative and positive opinions about CNL appeared to be reinforced by the publication. Opinion about the best treatment and advice to patients were not fully consistent with each other.
pubmed:language
dut
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0028-2162
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
16
pubmed:volume
135
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
464-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
[The effect of publications on clinical practice; chemonucleolysis].
pubmed:affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum, afd. Neurologie, Amsterdam.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract