Linked Life Data

20233525

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20233525

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-3-17
pubmed:abstractText
This clinical study compared induction time, consumed anaesthetic dose, and haemodynamic and recovery profiles when using a new type of multifunctional anaesthesia machine (Zeus) in semi-closed or closed circuit modes. Sixty female patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were randomly assigned to three groups and received desflurane anaesthesia through a semi-closed circuit (SCC) at fresh gas flow rates of 4 l/min (SCC 4 l/min) or 2 l/min (SCC 2 l/min), or through a closed circuit (CC). Anaesthesia was maintained at the minimum alveolar concentration for blocking the adrenergic response to painful stimulus (MAC(BAR)) (4.6% end-tidal desflurane) during each operation. The time required to reach MAC(BAR) was significantly shorter and the dose of desflurane was significantly smaller in the CC group compared with the other groups. There were no differences in haemodynamic and recovery profiles between the groups. It is concluded that the CC mode allowed a faster and more reliable induction, lower anaesthetic consumption and stable haemodynamic and recovery profiles.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0300-0605
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
160-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of consumption and recovery profiles according to anaesthetic circuit mode using a new multifunctional closed-circuit anaesthesia system during desflurane anaesthesia: a clinical study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial