Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20231389
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-4-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Ethambutol, together with a macrolide, is the backbone for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium disease. However, at the standard dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight/day, ethambutol efficacy is limited. In addition, susceptibility breakpoints have consistently failed to predict clinical outcome. We performed dose-effect studies with extracellular M. avium as well as with bacilli within human macrophages. The maximal kill rate (E(max)) for ethambutol against extracellular bacilli was 5.54 log(10) CFU/ml, compared to 0.67 log(10) CFU/ml for intracellular M. avium, after 7 days of exposure. Thus, extracellular assays demonstrated high efficacy. We created a hollow-fiber system model of intracellular M. avium and performed microbial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies using pharmacokinetics similar to those of ethambutol for humans. The E(max) in the systems was 0.79 log(10) CFU/ml with 7 days of daily therapy, so the kill rates approximated those encountered in patients treated with ethambutol monotherapy. Ratio of peak concentration to MIC (C(max)/MIC) was linked to microbial kill rate. The C(max)/MIC ratio needed to achieve the 90% effective concentration (EC(90)) in serum was 1.23, with a calculated intramacrophage C(max)/MIC ratio of 13. In 10,000 patient Monte Carlo simulations, doses of 15, 50, and 75 mg/kg achieved the EC(90) in 35.50%, 76.81%, and 86.12% of patients, respectively. Therefore, ethambutol doses of >or=50 mg/kg twice a week would be predicted to be better than current doses of 15 mg/kg for treatment of disseminated M. avium disease. New susceptibility breakpoints and critical concentrations of 1 to 2 mg/liter were identified for the determination of ethambutol-resistant M. avium in Middlebrook broth. Given that the modal MIC of clinical isolates is around 2 mg/liter, most isolates should be considered ethambutol resistant.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1098-6596
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
54
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1728-33
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-2
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Antitubercular Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Cells, Cultured,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Dose-Response Relationship, Drug,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Drug Resistance, Microbial,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Ethambutol,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Macrophages,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Microbial Sensitivity Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Models, Biological,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Monte Carlo Method,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Mycobacterium avium,
pubmed-meshheading:20231389-Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Ethambutol optimal clinical dose and susceptibility breakpoint identification by use of a novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of disseminated intracellular Mycobacterium avium.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Infectious Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9113, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|