Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20227096rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024530lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0684224lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026882lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683598lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086022lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0322926lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018381lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705099lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442335lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:dateCreated2010-8-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of our entomological survey was to estimate mosquito biodiversity, infectivity rates and insecticide resistance levels in Anopheles species in four study sites in a mining area with high malaria transmission in southeastern Guinea. Anopheles gambiae s.l. (77%) was the most common Anopheles collected followed by An. funestus (20%). The specimens of the An. gambiae complex were predominantly An. gambiae S form (97.6%) with 1.4% of An. gambiae M form found in Kérouané only, and 1% of An. arabiensis which was present in all four study sites. Anopheles gambiae S form and An. funestus were found to be infected with Plasmodium falciparum, with infectivity rates of 4.1% and 4.4% and inoculation rates of 0.60 and 0.19 infected bite/person/night, respectively. In addition, a high level (79%) of the knockdown resistance (kdr) L1014F mutation was reported in the populations of An. gambiae S form. The high malaria transmission that occurs in the prospected area of Guinea requires a long-term vector control programme. However, such a control programme will have to consider the presence of the kdr gene at a surprisingly high level within the dominant vector, which could reduce the expected impact of vector control.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:issn1878-3503lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarnevaliLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TotoJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KeitaMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ManguinSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuibertPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2010 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:volume104lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:pagination484-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20227096...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:articleTitleEntomological survey and report of a knockdown resistance mutation in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from the Republic of Guinea.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:affiliationInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, Ave Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier, France.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20227096pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:20227096lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:20227096lld:pubmed