Linked Life Data

20194027

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20194027

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-7-12
pubmed:abstractText
The decision to proceed to simple underwater seal drainage or to apply active suction to the underwater seal following pulmonary operation is a controversial one. For the sake of selecting the alternative to reduce postoperative air leakage, we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the benefit of suction or non-suction following lung surgery on patient outcomes.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
1873-734X
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
210-5
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
Suction or non-suction to the underwater seal drains following pulmonary operation: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
pubmed:affiliation
Thoracic Surgery Department, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, PR China.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Meta-Analysis