Linked Life Data

20144449

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20144449

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-2-10
pubmed:abstractText
The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph Human tetanus immunoglobulin (0398) gives a clear outline of the in vivo assay to be performed to determine the potency of human tetanus immunoglobulins during their development. Furthermore, it states that an in vitro method shall be validated for the batch potency estimation. Since no further guidance is given on the in vitro assay, every control laboratory concerned is free to design and validate an in-house method. At the moment there is no agreed in vitro method available. The aim of this study was to validate and compare 2 alternative in vitro assays, i.e. an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) and a toxoid inhibition assay (TIA), through an international collaborative study, in view of their eventual inclusion into the Ph. Eur.. The study was run in the framework of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP), under the aegis of the European Commission and the Council of Europe. The collaborative study reported here involved 21 laboratories (public and industry) from 15 countries. Initially, 3 samples with low, medium and high potencies were tested by EIA and TIA. Results showed good reproducibility and repeatability of the 2 in vitro methods. The correlation of the data with the in vivo potency assigned by the manufacturers however appeared initially poor for high potency samples. Thorough re-examination of the data showed that the in vivo potencies assigned by the manufacturers had to be corrected: one for potency loss at the time of in vitro testing and one because of a reporting error. After these corrections the values obtained by in vivo and in vitro methods were in close agreement. A supplementary collaborative work was carried out to validate the 2 methods for immunoglobulin products with high potencies. Eight laboratories (public and industry) took part in this additional study to test 3 samples with medium and high potencies by EIA and TIA. Results confirmed that the 2 alternative methods are comparable in terms of assay repeatability, precision and reproducibility. In all laboratories, both methods discriminated between the low, medium and high potency samples. Analysis of the data collected in this study showed a good correlation between EIA and TIA potency estimates as well as a close agreement between values obtained by in vitro and in vivo methods. The study demonstrated that EIA and TIA are suitable quality control methods for polyclonal human tetanus immunoglobulin, which can be standardised in a quality control laboratory using a quality assurance system. Consequently, the Ph. Eur. Group of Experts 6B on Human Blood and Blood products decided in April 2009 to include both methods as examples in the Ph. Eur. monograph 0398 on Human Tetanus immunoglobulin.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
2075-2164
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2009
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
11-25
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Collaborative study for the validation of alternative in vitro potency assays for human tetanus immunoglobulin.
pubmed:affiliation
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, 63225 Langen, Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Validation Studies