Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-5-12
pubmed:abstractText
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by progressive elevation in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and total pulmonary vascular resistance (TPVR). Recent advances in imaging techniques have allowed the development of new echocardiographic parameters to evaluate disease progression. However, there are no reports comparing the diagnostic performance of these non-invasive parameters to each other and to invasive measurements. Therefore, we investigated the diagnostic yield of echocardiographically derived TPVR and Doppler parameters of PAP in screening and measuring the severity of PAH in a rat model. Serial echocardiographic and invasive measurements were performed at baseline, 21 and 35 days after monocrotaline-induction of PAH. The most challenging echocardiographic derived TPVR measurement had good correlation with the invasive measurement (r = 0.92, P < 0.001) but also more simple and novel parameters of TPVR were found to be useful although the non-invasive TPVR measurement was feasible in only 29% of the studies due to lack of sufficient tricuspid valve regurgitation. However, echocardiographic measures of PAP, pulmonary artery flow acceleration time (PAAT) and deceleration (PAD), were measurable in all animals, and correlated with invasive PAP (r = -0.74 and r = 0.75, P < 0.001 for both). Right ventricular thickness and area correlated with invasive PAP (r = 0.59 and r = 0.64, P < 0.001 for both). Observer variability of the invasive and non-invasive parameters was low except in tissue-Doppler derived isovolumetric relaxation time. These non-invasive parameters may be used to replace invasive measurements in detecting successful disease induction and to complement invasive data in the evaluation of PAH severity in a rat model.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-10430725, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-11401116, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-12063310, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-12651052, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-14636929, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-15249493, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-15486398, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-15728335, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-15888866, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-16055521, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-16570186, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-16731643, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-17142350, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-17207721, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-17586694, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-17689753, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-17845932, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-18187297, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-18454278, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-18490309, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-18579484, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-1863023, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-18839484, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-19164700, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-19555858, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-19634000, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-19713419, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-20473785, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-2868172, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-3946222, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-3962874, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-5364641, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-5561407, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-6231042, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-6449154, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-6451183, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/20140524-6861308
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
1875-8312
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
26
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
509-18
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-1
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of echocardiography to invasive measurement in the evaluation of pulmonary arterial hypertension in a rat model.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0103, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. juhkos@utu.fi
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't