20039915

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20039915

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0079850, umls-concept:C0205142, umls-concept:C0205160, umls-concept:C0205284, umls-concept:C0332282, umls-concept:C1306673
pubmed:issue	2
pubmed:dateCreated	2010-4-20
pubmed:abstractText	The hallmark of Mohs micrographic surgery is using tangential tissue sections that theoretically allow 100% of the tissue margin to be examined, but when taking additional layers for second and subsequent Mohs stages, no detailed methods have been described to ensure that 100% of the tissue margins are analyzed.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/9504371
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Feb
pubmed:issn	1524-4725
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:FinnDaniel TDT, pubmed-author:YuYueY
pubmed:issnType	Electronic
pubmed:volume	36
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	171-6
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:20039915-General Surgery, pubmed-meshheading:20039915-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:20039915-Mohs Surgery, pubmed-meshheading:20039915-Physician's Practice Patterns, pubmed-meshheading:20039915-Population Surveillance
pubmed:year	2010
pubmed:articleTitle	Crescent versus rectangle: is it a true negative margin in second and subsequent stages of Mohs surgery?
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA. emily.yu.2006@gmail.com
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies