Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20034833rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007876lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205484lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205156lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1273870lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:dateCreated2010-2-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:abstractTextThe authors announce their own experience and data of the literature to clarify their policy in cases of pregnancy after a previous caesarean section. For obstetricians, the question is to accept a trial of labor for vaginal birth or to decide an elective caesarean section. We particularly explain our conclusions in cases of breech deliveries, twin pregnancies, fetal pelvic disproportion, maternal diabetes, and labor inductions. In cases of previous caesarean, a trial of labor can be successfully tempted in numerous situations. Nevertheless, there are some limits not to be crossed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:issn1769-6682lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PoulainPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SecondoEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2009. Published by Elsevier SAS.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:pagination48-57lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20034833...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:articleTitle[Obstetrical management of women with previous caesarean section].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:affiliationPôle obstétrique, gynécologie, biologie de la reproduction, chirurgie plastique et reconstructrice, hôpital SUD, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France. patrice.poulain@chu-rennes.frlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20034833pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed