rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-2-17
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Phenotypic accuracy and specificity are essential for a successful genetic association study. Blood pressure (BP) measurements show heterogeneity depending on the method and time of measurement, sexual dimorphism and measurement errors, making genetic dissection difficult.
|
pubmed:grant |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1473-5598
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:BrambillaPaolaP,
pubmed-author:CesanaGiancarloG,
pubmed-author:DellesChristianC,
pubmed-author:DominiczakAnna FAF,
pubmed-author:GrassiGuidoG,
pubmed-author:LaingStewartS,
pubmed-author:LeeWai KWK,
pubmed-author:ManciaGiuseppeG,
pubmed-author:MenniCristinaC,
pubmed-author:PadmanabhanSandoshS,
pubmed-author:PeregoRobertoR,
pubmed-author:SegaRobertoR
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
28
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
465-77
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The effects of sex and method of blood pressure measurement on genetic associations with blood pressure in the PAMELA study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|