Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20029065
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-12-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We examined the relative efficiency of non-clinical sites to screen for chlamydia in youth and young adults. Chlamydia screening targeting youth (under 30 years of age) was performed at non-clinical sites in high-morbidity neighbourhoods of two California counties. Venues were subdivided into community outreach, schools, parenting centres and drug treatment/correctional facilities. Relative efficiency was estimated with multivariate Poisson regression using incidence of chlamydia per person-hours labour adjusting for strategy and county. Among the 1514 youths screened, the overall prevalence of chlamydia was 5.5%. By venue, the highest prevalence was in drug treatment/correction facilities at 11.1% followed by parenting centres at 6.3%, community outreach at 4.9% and schools at 4.6%. Drug treatment/correctional facilities were the most labour time efficient at 9.9 person-hours per chlamydia case. Schools and parenting centres had the lowest cost per screen at 0.9 person-hours per screen. Adjusted relative labour time efficiency (chlamydia cases per paid person-hour) was significantly higher in schools, 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-4.2), parenting centres, 3.2 (95% CI 1.6-6.6) and drug treatment/correctional facilities, 2.9 (95% CI 1.0-7.8), compared with community outreach. In conclusion, parenting centres and drug treatment centres and correctional facilities are the most efficient venues for chlamydia screening.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0956-4624
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
21
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
52-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-8-25
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-California,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Chlamydia Infections,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Chlamydia trachomatis,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Costs and Cost Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Mass Screening,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Prevalence,
pubmed-meshheading:20029065-Young Adult
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Relative efficiency of chlamydia screening in non-clinical settings in two California counties.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
California Department of Public Health, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Control Branch, Richmond, USA. shmorris@ucsd.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|