|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-12-21
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The extensive research literature on electronic patient records (EPRs) presents challenges to systematic reviewers because it covers multiple research traditions with different underlying philosophical assumptions and methodological approaches.
|
|
pubmed:grant |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1468-0009
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
87
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
729-88
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University College London, England. p.greenhalgh@ucl.ac.uk
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
