|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-12-1
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Since the initial development of the defibrillator, there has been concern that, while delivery of a large electric shock would stop fibrillation, it would also cause damage to the heart. This concern has been raised again with the development of the biphasic defibrillator.
|
|
pubmed:grant |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1545-0066
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
14
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
62-70
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-9-22
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of low-energy versus high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medicine-Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. gpw@crml.uab.edu
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|
