Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19926201
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-2-1
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To compare the clinical results of three minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1872-7654
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
2009. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
148
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
172-6
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|