rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
11
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-11-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To assess the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approach for coronary artery bifurcation lesions (CBL), we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing provisional stenting (PS) to complex stenting strategy (CS).
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1557-2501
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
21
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
589-95
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Coronary Artery Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Coronary Restenosis,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Incidence,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Myocardial Infarction,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:19901414-Stents
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Provisional vs. complex stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. ahakeem@gmail.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Meta-Analysis
|