Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19895618
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-2-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake oral fibreoptic intubation in morbidly obese patients was evaluated using two doses of local anaesthetic. In this randomised, blinded prospective study, 40 ml of atomised 1% (n = 11) or 2% (n = 10) lidocaine was administered with high oxygen flow as carrier. Outcomes included time for intubation, patient tolerance to airway manipulation, haemodynamic parameters, the bronchoscopist's overall satisfaction, and serial serum lidocaine concentrations. Patients receiving lidocaine 1% had a longer mean (SD) time from the start of topicalisation to tracheal tube cuff inflation than those receiving lidocaine 2% (8.6 (0.9) min vs 6.9 (0.5) min, respectively; p < 0.05). Patients in the 1% cohort demonstrated increased responses to airway manipulation (p < 0.0001), reflecting lower bronchoscopist's satisfaction scores (p < 0.03). Haemodynamic responses to topicalisation and airway manipulation were similar in both groups. Peak plasma concentration was lower in the 1% group (mean (SD) 1.4 (0.3) and 3.8 (0.5) microg.ml(-1), respectively; p < 0.001). Airway anaesthesia using atomised lidocaine for awake oral fibreoptic intubation in the morbidly obese is efficacious, rapid and safe. Compared with lidocaine 1%, the 2% dose provides superior intubating conditions.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
1365-2044
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
65
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
12-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-4-21
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Anesthesia, Local,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Anesthetics, Local,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Blood Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Dose-Response Relationship, Drug,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Fiber Optic Technology,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Gastric Bypass,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Heart Rate,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Intubation, Intratracheal,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Lidocaine,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Obesity, Morbid,
pubmed-meshheading:19895618-Prospective Studies
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Atomised lidocaine for airway topical anaesthesia in the morbidly obese: 1% compared with 2%.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anesthesia, MUHC-Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|