Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
2009-11-30
pubmed:abstractText
The combination of cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has widely been used to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, however, alternative approaches such as G-CSF alone or etoposide followed by G-CSF have been investigated. We, therefore, retrospectively analyzed the effects of these mobilization methods on collection yield and disease outcome in ASCT for MM. We reviewed 146 MM patients from whom we intended to collect stem cells. For mobilization, 67, 58, and 21 patients received cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, etoposide and G-CSF, and G-CSF alone (including nonmyelosuppressive chemotherapy followed by G-CSF), respectively. Among them, 136 achieved the target number of HSCs (at least 2 x 10(6)/kg). Lower creatinine and higher albumin levels at diagnosis were significantly associated with successful yield. A lower number of infused HSCs, use of the etoposide for mobilization and high ISS were associated with delayed hematopoietic recovery. The mobilization methods did not significantly affect either the successful collection of more than 2 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg or PFS after ASCT. G-CSF alone was sufficient for stem cell mobilization for a single ASCT. The optimal approach to collect HSCs in MM remains to be elucidated.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1096-8652
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
(c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
84
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
809-14
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Cell Count, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Combined Modality Therapy, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Creatinine, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Cyclophosphamide, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Disease-Free Survival, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Drug Synergism, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Etoposide, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Female, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Male, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Multiple Myeloma, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Recombinant Proteins, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Retrospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Serum Albumin, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Transplantation, Autologous, pubmed-meshheading:19862826-Transplantation Conditioning
pubmed:year
2009
pubmed:articleTitle
Retrospective comparison of mobilization methods for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Hematology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma-cho, Saitama, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies